Ratingfirmporemontu.ru - SEO Checker

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

ИНТЕРНЕТ-МАГАЗИН АГРО-СФЕРА - ПРОДАЖА ЗАПЧАСТЕЙ ДЛЯ ТРАКТОРОВ, КОМБАЙНОВ И ГРУЗОВЫХ АВТОМОБИЛЕЙ

agro-sfera.com

ЗАПЧАСТЮГА.РФ - КУПИТЬ Б/У ЗАПЧАСТИ ДЛЯ ИНОМАРОК. КУЗОВНЫЕ ДЕТАЛИ, АВТОРАЗБОРКА

xn--80aaalr3cpi6b8d.xn--p1ai

HOME - ANABOLIC MENU

anabolicmenu.ws

БЛОГ О РАЗНОМ

lomikoni.wordpress.com

РЕЙТИНГ КОМПАНИЙ ПО РЕМОНТУ И ОБУСТРОЙСТВУ КВАРТИР/ДОМОВ В МОСКВЕ И ОБЛАСТИ - ЛУЧШИЕ ФИРМЫ

ratingfirmporemontu.ru

ONLINE INVESTMENT - INTEREST ACCRUAL FROM 0.2% TO 0.5% DAILY

zion-finance.com

LEDVSEM - ИНТЕРНЕТ МАГАЗИН СВЕТОДИОДНОЙ ПРОДУКЦИИ

ledvsem.com.ua

Latest Sites

КЛИНИКА ЭКО В МОСКВЕ - МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ЦЕНТР ИСКУССТВЕННОГО ОПЛОДОТВОРЕНИЯ МАК ЭКО

mac-ivf.ru

META PANTHERS — FIRST NFT PROJECT ON THE TON BLOCKCHAIN

metapanthers.ru

HOME - RISSO-CHEMICAL FERTILIZER,UREA,NPK FERTILIZER, HUMATE

risso-chemical.com

УСЛУГИ ЧАСТНОГО БУХГАЛТЕРА В ЧЕЛЯБИНСКЕ: УДАЛЕННО И ОЧНО, ЦЕНЫ

belkabuh.ru

bizsreda.ru

KAMERY SE ---EM NAŽIVO: --- --- SHOW A CHAT - JET SET CAM

jetsetcam.com

CHIRIE VPS ✔ VDS ✔ SERVERE DEDICATE ÎN MOLDOVA # ROOT.MD

root.md

Top Technologies

PHP

Programming Languages

Nginx

Web Servers

Google Font API

Font Scripts

jQuery

Javascript Frameworks

Font Awesome

Font Scripts

WordPress

CMS

CloudFlare

CDN

Apache

Web Servers

Twitter Bootstrap

Web Frameworks

Gzip

Compress

26 ratingfirmporemontu.ru Last Updated: 3 years

Success 62% of passed verification steps

Warning 23% of total warning

Errors 15% of total errors, require fast action

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 94%

Best Practices Desktop Score 85%

SEO Desktop Score 91%

Progressive Web App Desktop Score 52%

Performance Mobile Score 53%

Best Practices Mobile Score 77%

SEO Mobile Score 91%

Progressive Web App Mobile Score 54%

Page Authority Authority 22%

Domain Authority Domain Authority 21%

Moz Rank 2.2/10

Bounce Rate Rate 0%

Charset Encoding

Great, language/character encoding is specified: UTF-8

Title Tag 90 Characters

РЕЙТИНГ КОМПАНИЙ ПО РЕМОНТУ И ОБУСТРОЙСТВУ КВАРТИР/ДОМОВ В МОСКВЕ И ОБЛАСТИ - ЛУЧШИЕ ФИРМЫ

Meta Description 90 Characters

Рейтинг компаний по ремонту и обустройству квартир/домов в Москве и Области - лучшие фирмы

Effective URL 34 Characters

https://www.ratingfirmporemontu.ru

Excerpt Page content

Рейтинг компаний по ремонту и обустройству квартир/домов в Москве и Области - лучшие фирмы ...

Keywords Cloud Density

отзывов223 отзывы66 реклама38 цены32 ремонт32 балконов30 окна26 остекление22 квартир21 фирм20

Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO

Keyword	Freq	Title	Desc	Domain	H1	H2
отзывов	223
отзывы	66
реклама	38
цены	32
ремонт	32
балконов	30
окна	26
остекление	22
квартир	21
фирм	20

Google Preview Your look like this in google search result

РЕЙТИНГ КОМПАНИЙ ПО РЕМОНТУ И ОБУСТРОЙСТВУ КВАРТИР/ДОМОВ В М

https://www.ratingfirmporemontu.ru

Рейтинг компаний по ремонту и обустройству квартир/домов в Москве и Области - лучшие фирмы

Robots.txt File Detected

http://ratingfirmporemontu.ru/robots.txt

Sitemap.xml File Detected

http://ratingfirmporemontu.ru/sitemap.xml

Whois Is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system

Updated: 1970-01-01 / 54 years

Create on: 2018-09-11 / 5 years

Expires on: 2021-09-11 / 24 months 19 days

REGRU-RU ,

Nameservers

ns1.mchost.ru.

ns2.mchost.ru.

ns3.mchost.ru.

ns4.mchost.ru.

Page Size Code & Text Ratio

Document Size: ~458.39 KB

Code Size: ~121.82 KB

Text Size: ~336.58 KB Ratio: 73.43%

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

2,023

Unique Visits

Daily

3,742

Pages Views

Daily

Income

Daily

56,644

Unique Visits

Monthly

106,647

Pages Views

Monthly

$50

Income

Monthly

655,452

Unique Visits

Yearly

1,257,312

Pages Views

Yearly

$528

Income

Yearly

Technologies

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

PWA - Manifest

Manifest is not valid

Your site don't have valid manifest.json, read more in Web App Manifest

Desktop

Avoid an excessive DOM size 2,437 elements

A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)

Avoid long main-thread tasks 1 long task found

Lists the longest tasks on the main thread, useful for identifying worst contributors to input delay

Avoid large layout shifts 5 elements found

These DOM elements contribute most to the CLS of the page.

Total Blocking Time 20 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds

JavaScript execution time 0.2 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Minimizes main-thread work 0.6 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 87 requests • 734 KiB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Remove unused JavaScript Potential savings of 225 KiB

Remove unused JavaScript to reduce bytes consumed by network activity

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 6 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

First Meaningful Paint 1.0 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Initial server response time was short Root document took 260 ms

Keep the server response time for the main document short because all other requests depend on it

Largest Contentful Paint element 1 element found

This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport

First Contentful Paint 1.0 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Speed Index 1.2 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

Cumulative Layout Shift 0.048

Cumulative Layout Shift measures the movement of visible elements within the viewport

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 734 KiB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minify CSS Potential savings of 6 KiB

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 9 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 18 chains found

The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load

Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 25 KiB

Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity

Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 650 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Time to Interactive 1.2 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Estimated Input Latency 10 ms

Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy

Largest Contentful Paint 1.3 s

Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted

First CPU Idle 1.0 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle/).

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 8 KiB

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time

Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task

Mobile

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 734 KiB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Document uses legible font sizes 90.14% legible text

Font sizes less than 12px are too small to be legible and require mobile visitors to “pinch to zoom” in order to read. Strive to have >60% of page text ≥12px

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 2,480 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Largest Contentful Paint element 1 element found

This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport

Minimize main-thread work 3.8 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 26 KiB

Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity

Remove unused JavaScript Potential savings of 226 KiB

Remove unused JavaScript to reduce bytes consumed by network activity

Largest Contentful Paint 4.0 s

Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted

First Contentful Paint 4.0 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 87 requests • 734 KiB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Speed Index 4.1 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

Total Blocking Time 890 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 6 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Initial server response time was short Root document took 280 ms

Keep the server response time for the main document short because all other requests depend on it

Minify CSS Potential savings of 6 KiB

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Max Potential First Input Delay 730 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task

Time to Interactive 6.2 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Avoid an excessive DOM size 2,437 elements

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

First Meaningful Paint 4.0 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Estimated Input Latency 340 ms

First Contentful Paint (3G) 7831 ms

First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Avoid long main-thread tasks 9 long tasks found

Lists the longest tasks on the main thread, useful for identifying worst contributors to input delay

Tap targets are not sized appropriately 94% appropriately sized tap targets

Interactive elements like buttons and links should be large enough (48x48px), and have enough space around them, to be easy enough to tap without overlapping onto other elements

Reduce the impact of third-party code Third-party code blocked the main thread for 740 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Reduce JavaScript execution time 2.1 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 9 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 8 KiB

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time

First CPU Idle 6.1 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle/).

Avoid chaining critical requests 18 chains found

Speed And Optimization Tips

Website speed has a huge impact on performance, affecting user experience, conversion rates and even rankings. ‪‬‬By reducing page load-times, users are less likely to get distracted and the search engines are more likely to reward you by ranking you

Title Website

Warning! Your title is not optimized

Description Website

Congratulations! Your description is optimized

Robots.txt

Congratulations! Your site have a robots.txt file

Sitemap.xml

Congratulations! We've found a sitemap file for your website

SSL Secure

Congratulations! Your site have Support to HTTPS

Headings

Congratulations! You are using your H1 and H2 tags in your site

Blacklist

Congratulations! Your site is not listed in a blacklist

W3C Validator

Warning! Your site have errors W3C

Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP)

Warning! Your site not have AMP Version

Domain Authority

Warning! Domain Authority of your website is slow. It is good to have domain authority more than 25.

GZIP Compress

Warning! Your site not is compressed, this can make slower response for the visitors

Favicon

Congratulations! Your website appears to have a favicon.

Broken Links

Congratulations! You not have broken links View links

First 20 Links	Relationship	HTTP Status
http://ratingfirmporemontu.ru/	Internal Link	301
Волгоград	Internal Link	200
Воронеж	Internal Link	200
Екатеринбург	Internal Link	200
Казань	Internal Link	200
Ковров	Internal Link	200
Краснодар	Internal Link	200
Красноярск	Internal Link	200
Москва	Internal Link	200
Нижний Новгород	Internal Link	200
Новосибирск	Internal Link	200
Омск	Internal Link	200
Ростов-на-Дону	Internal Link	200
Самара	Internal Link	200
Санкт-Петербург	Internal Link	200
Саратов	Internal Link	200
Тула	Internal Link	200
Тюмень	Internal Link	200
Уфа	Internal Link	200
Челябинск	Internal Link	200

Alexa Rank

1,469,746

Global Rank

55,348

Russia

Traffic

Search

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:56:59 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=60
Vary: Accept-Encoding
P3P: policyref="/bitrix/p3p.xml", CP="NON DSP COR CUR ADM DEV PSA PSD OUR UNR BUS UNI COM NAV INT DEM STA"
X-Powered-CMS: Bitrix Site Manager (91f295d8e05c12e7c86f619ac2b3b6fc)
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
Pragma: no-cache
Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=gug9iqhl78a0m4j65cfucel1ac; path=/; domain=ratingfirmporemontu.ru; HttpOnly
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname

View DNS Records

Type	Name	Value	Class	TTL
A	ratingfirmporemontu.ru	178.208.91.87	IN	597
NS	ratingfirmporemontu.ru	ns4.mchost.ru	IN	599
NS	ratingfirmporemontu.ru	ns3.mchost.ru	IN	599
NS	ratingfirmporemontu.ru	ns1.mchost.ru	IN	599
NS	ratingfirmporemontu.ru	ns2.mchost.ru	IN	599
MX	ratingfirmporemontu.ru	mx.yandex.ru	IN	599
TXT	ratingfirmporemontu.ru	v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.ru	IN	599

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

Latest Sites

Top Technologies

26 ratingfirmporemontu.ru Last Updated: 3 years

Desktop

Mobile

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Technologies

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

PWA - Manifest

Desktop

Mobile

Speed And Optimization Tips

Alexa Rank

1,469,746

55,348

Information Server

Comments

About Us

Contact Info

Follow Us